MIR JABIR CHINMAYI TRIPATHY, S.K.MAHANTY,S.S.MOHAPATRA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/21764/2025
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.
CNR: ODHC010545072025
e-Filing Number
01-08-2025
Filing Number
WP(C)/30984/2025
Filing Date
01-Aug-2025
Registration No
WP(C)/21764/2025
Registration Date
04-Aug-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Harish Tandon (Cj) , Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
Coram
Mr. Justice Harish Tandon (Cj) , Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MINES, MINERALS AND MINING LEASES ( 27 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MIR JABIR CHINMAYI TRIPATHY, S.K.MAHANTY,S.S.MOHAPATRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY, STEEL AND MINES DEPT., ODISHA
-
3.COLLECTOR AND DIST.MAGISTRATE, CUTTACK
-
4.SUB-COLLECTOR, CUTTACK
-
5.TAHASILDAR, KANTAPADA
-
6.MINING OFFICER, CUTTACK
-
7.IIC, GOVINDPUR
-
8.RTA, BBSR-1
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Harish Tandon (Cj),mr. Justice Murahari Sri RamanView PDF
The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Mir Jabir as withdrawn, since the petitioner did not appear at the hearing. The court granted the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate authority for redressal of his grievance, as sought through counsel's memo. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Oct-2025
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Harish Tandon (Cj) , Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
-
11-Sep-2025
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Harish Tandon (Cj) , Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
-
21-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/21764/2025
The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Mir Jabir as withdrawn, since the petitioner did not appear at the hearing. The court granted the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate authority for redressal of his grievance, as sought through counsel's memo. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts