SUBASH CHANDRA PATRA vs THE DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, KHURDA — WP(C)/22393/2023

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010544092023

Filing Number

WP(C)/22393/2023

Filing Date

17-Jul-2023

Registration No

WP(C)/22393/2023

Registration Date

17-Jul-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Coram

Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBASH CHANDRA PATRA

    Adv. TRILOCHAN DASH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, KHURDA

  2. 2.GENERAL MANAGER,S.C. RAILWAY DEPT,SEKANDERABAD

  3. 3.PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER,S.C. RAILWAY DEPT

  4. 4.SR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER,S.C.RAILWAY DEPT

  5. 5.CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER,S.C. RAILWAY DEPT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack directed the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, South Central Railway, Secunderabad, to consider and dispose of the petitioner's pending representation regarding refund of advance freight and compensation for loss of 20 bullocks during railway transportation within one month, and communicate the result within one week thereafter. The court did not grant the substantive relief sought but instead referred the matter back to the railway administration for proper administrative redressal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

  4. 17-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/22393/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa at Cuttack directed the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, South Central Railway, Secunderabad, to consider and dispose of the petitioner's pending representation regarding refund of advance freight and compensation for loss of 20 bullocks during railway transportation within one month, and communicate the result within one week thereafter. The court did not grant the substantive relief sought but instead referred the matter back to the railway administration for proper administrative redressal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case