ODISHA MINING CORPORATION LTD., BBSR IPSIT AUROBINDO ACHARYA, PAMI RATH, C.K.ROUT vs UNION OF INDIA — WA/1444/2025
Case under Orissa High Court Rules 1948 Section 4. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010506902025
Filing Number
WA/28902/2025
Filing Date
18-07-2025
Registration No
WA/1444/2025
Registration Date
25-08-2025
Judge
MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S. , MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
Coram
MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S. , MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ODISHA MINING CORPORATION LTD., BBSR IPSIT AUROBINDO ACHARYA, PAMI RATH, C.K.ROUT
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA
MEMBER SECRETARY, MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES FACILITATION COUNCIL AND DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES
M/S. INDIANA ENGINEERING WORKS (BOMBAY) PVT LTD.
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S. , MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
FRESH ADMISSION - (WRIT APPEAL)
FRESH ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-10-2025 | FRESH ADMISSION - (WRIT APPEAL) |
| 09-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 06-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 09-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 09-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Orissa dismissed Odisha Mining Corporation Limited's appeal challenging an MSEFC arbitration award, holding that the company has an alternate and equally efficacious remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court clarified that challenges to arbitration awards on procedural or merit grounds must be pursued through the statutory Section 34 mechanism, not through writ petitions under Articles 226-227 of the Constitution, and ruled that time spent in the writ proceedings shall be discounted under the Limitation Act when computing the limitation period for a Section 34 petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Orissa dismissed Odisha Mining Corporation Limited's appeal challenging an MSEFC arbitration award, holding that the company has an alternate and equally efficacious remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court clarified that challenges to arbitration awards on procedural or merit grounds must be pursued through the statutory Section 34 mechanism, not through writ petitions under Articles 226-227 of the Constitution, and ruled that time spent in the writ proceedings shall be discounted under the Limitation Act when computing the limitation period for a Section 34 petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts