PRAVAT DASH M/S.JATINDRA KUMAR MOHAPATRA vs EXECUTIVE ENGINEERELECT.,BED,CESU — WP(C)/11683/2015

Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Jul-2015

CNR: ODHC010494202015

Filing Number

WP(C)/11683/2015

Filing Date

29-Jun-2015

Registration No

WP(C)/11683/2015

Registration Date

29-Jun-2015

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

COMPENSATION MATTER ( 7 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO TELEPHONE, ELECTRICITY,WATER ETC. ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAVAT DASH M/S.JATINDRA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.EXECUTIVE ENGINEERELECT.,BED,CESU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition filed by Pravat Dash challenging an Ombudsman order regarding a duplicate electricity demand of Rs. 73,525 that was allegedly raised twice—once in 2005 (which he paid) and again in 2014 when providing a new connection to his tenant. The court held that the dispute is entirely civil in nature and found no illegality in the Ombudsman's order, directing the petitioner to pursue relief through the competent civil court instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

  5. 13-May-2017

    Lok Adalat-1

    Dr. Justice B.r.sarangi

  6. 13-May-2017

    Lok Adalat-1

    Dr. Justice B.r.sarangi

  7. 13-May-2017

    Lok Adalat-1

    Dr. Justice B.r.sarangi

  8. 20-Jul-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 29-Jun-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/11683/2015

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition filed by Pravat Dash challenging an Ombudsman order regarding a duplicate electricity demand of Rs. 73,525 that was allegedly raised twice—once in 2005 (which he paid) and again in 2014 when providing a new connection to his tenant. The court held that the dispute is entirely civil in nature and found no illegality in the Ombudsman's order, directing the petitioner to pursue relief through the competent civil court instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case