S. ARUNA RANI vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/18483/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.
CNR: ODHC010451542026
Filing Number
WP(C)/26950/2026
Filing Date
18-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/18483/2026
Registration Date
18-Jun-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )
Sub-Category
PROMOTION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S. ARUNA RANI
Adv. KRISHNA CHANDRA SAHU,S.PRADHAN, D.K.MAHALIK, R.SAHOO,S.PRADHAN, D.K.MAHALIK, R.SAHOO, S.PRADHAN, D.K.MAHALIK, R.SAHOO
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.DIRECTOR, FAMILY WELFARE, ODISHA,BHUBANESWAR
-
3.CHIEF DISTRICT MEDICAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICER, GAJAPATI
-
4.BIJAYEE KUMARI MISHAL, MPHW(F), L-I
-
5.SANJU KUMARI BAURI ,MPHW(F),L-I
-
6.U. DHANALAXMI ,MPHW (F)L-I
-
7.SUJATA PADHI ,MPHW (F),L-I
-
8.ATASI DAS ,MPHW(F),L-I
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF
-
19-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF
Case Summary: S. Aruna Rani v. State of Odisha The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition without quashing the impugned promotion order, instead directing the Chief District Medical and Public Health Officer to decide any fresh application from the petitioner within specified timelines (2 weeks to receive application, 4 weeks to decide), in accordance with principles established in a prior judgment dated 22.01.2026. The government counsel raised no serious objection to this approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
-
18-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/18483/2026
Case Summary: S. Aruna Rani v. State of Odisha The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition without quashing the impugned promotion order, instead directing the Chief District Medical and Public Health Officer to decide any fresh application from the petitioner within specified timelines (2 weeks to receive application, 4 weeks to decide), in accordance with principles established in a prior judgment dated 22.01.2026. The government counsel raised no serious objection to this approach. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts