SASMITA PANIGRAHY vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/18481/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.
CNR: ODHC010451392026
Filing Number
WP(C)/26940/2026
Filing Date
18-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/18481/2026
Registration Date
18-Jun-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )
Sub-Category
PROMOTION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SASMITA PANIGRAHY
Adv. KRISHNA CHANDRA SAHU,S.PRADHAN, D.K.MAHALIK, R.SAHOO,S.PRADHAN, D.K.MAHALIK, R.SAHOO, S.PRADHAN, D.K.MAHALIK, R.SAHOO
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.DIRECTOR, FAMILY WELFARE, BHUBANESWAR
-
3.CHIEF DISTRICT MEDICAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICER, GAJAPATI
-
4.BIJAYEE KUMARI MISHAL
-
5.SANJU KUMARI BAURI
-
6.U. DHANALAXMI
-
7.SUJATA PADHI
-
8.ATASI DAS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF
-
19-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF
The High Court of Orissa disposed of Sasmita Panigrahy's writ petition challenging a promotion order dated 29.05.2026 for MPHW(F) positions, relying on principles established in an earlier judgment dated 22.01.2026 in W.P.(C) No. 7674/2025. The Court directed that if the petitioner files an application before the Chief District Medical and Public Health Officer (Opp. Party No. 3) within two weeks, the respondent must pass a lawful decision within four weeks thereafter, without deciding the petition on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
-
18-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/18481/2026
The High Court of Orissa disposed of Sasmita Panigrahy's writ petition challenging a promotion order dated 29.05.2026 for MPHW(F) positions, relying on principles established in an earlier judgment dated 22.01.2026 in W.P.(C) No. 7674/2025. The Court directed that if the petitioner files an application before the Chief District Medical and Public Health Officer (Opp. Party No. 3) within two weeks, the respondent must pass a lawful decision within four weeks thereafter, without deciding the petition on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts