PRADEEPTA KUMAR DASH vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/18455/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010450442026

Filing Number

WP(C)/26878/2026

Filing Date

18-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/18455/2026

Registration Date

18-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

03-TRANSFER ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRADEEPTA KUMAR DASH

    Adv. AMIYA KUMAR CHHATOI,P.K.SINHA, S.MAHAPATRA, P.K.PATRA,P.K.SINHA, S.MAHAPATRA, P.K.PATRA, P.K.SINHA, S.MAHAPATRA, P.K.PATRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS

  3. 3.REGIONAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS (RCCF), KORAPUT CIRCLE

  4. 4.DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, NABARANGPUR FOREST DIVISION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of Pradeepta Kumar Dash's writ petition challenging his transfer order dated 15.06.2026 without expressing any opinion on merits. The court directed the Regional Chief Conservator of Forests (Opposite Party No.3) to consider the petitioner's representation within three months, and permitted the petitioner to take leave pending the decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 18-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/18455/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of Pradeepta Kumar Dash's writ petition challenging his transfer order dated 15.06.2026 without expressing any opinion on merits. The court directed the Regional Chief Conservator of Forests (Opposite Party No.3) to consider the petitioner's representation within three months, and permitted the petitioner to take leave pending the decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case