SMARANIKA NAYAK PRABHAKAR SABAT, J.RANI, A.TANDIA, C.PARIDA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/18395/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.
CNR: ODHC010448192026
e-Filing Number
17-06-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/26765/2026
Filing Date
17-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/18395/2026
Registration Date
18-Jun-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )
Sub-Category
CONDITION OF SERVICE ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMARANIKA NAYAK PRABHAKAR SABAT, J.RANI, A.TANDIA, C.PARIDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY, SCHOOL AND MASS EDUCATION DEPT., BHUBANESWAR
-
3.ADDL. SECRETARY SCHOOL AND MASS EDUCATION DEPT., BHUBANESWAR
-
4.DIRECTORATE OF SECONDARY EDUCATION, ODISHA, BHUBANESWAR
-
5.COLLECTOR, RAYAGADA
-
6.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, RAYAGADA
-
7.BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, RAYAGADA
-
8.BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, GUDARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 18395/2026 The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by granting the petitioner liberty to file a fresh representation before the State (Opp. Party No. 1) within two weeks, challenging a transfer order passed by the District Education Officer, Rayagada. The Court directed the State to decide on the representation within two weeks of receipt and maintain status-quo regarding the petitioner's continuance until a decision is rendered, without directly quashing the impugned transfer order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
-
17-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/18395/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) 18395/2026 The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by granting the petitioner liberty to file a fresh representation before the State (Opp. Party No. 1) within two weeks, challenging a transfer order passed by the District Education Officer, Rayagada. The Court directed the State to decide on the representation within two weeks of receipt and maintain status-quo regarding the petitioner's continuance until a decision is rendered, without directly quashing the impugned transfer order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts