MANOJ DAS vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/18404/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.
CNR: ODHC010447022026
Filing Number
WP(C)/26689/2026
Filing Date
17-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/18404/2026
Registration Date
18-Jun-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )
Sub-Category
03-TRANSFER ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANOJ DAS
Adv. MANOJA KUMAR KHUNTIA,B.K.PATTANAIK,B.K.PATTANAIK, B.K.PATTANAIK
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, BHUBANESWAR
-
3.REGIONAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ANGUL CIRCLE
-
4.DFO, ATHAGARH FOREST DIVISION, ATHAGARH
-
5.DFO, ANGUL (KL) DIVISION, ANGUL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) No. 18404 of 2026 The High Court of Orissa disposed of Manoj Das's writ petition challenging his transfer order dated 8.6.2026, which he contended violated G.A. Department guidelines and State Forest Headquarters instructions requiring minimum 1 year 6 days tenure before transfer. Rather than quashing the transfer order, the court granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh representation before the Regional Chief Conservator of Forests (Opp. Party No. 3) within 2 weeks with supporting documents, directing the authority to decide within 2 weeks thereafter. Status quo regarding the petitioner's continuance was maintained pending this decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
-
17-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/18404/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) No. 18404 of 2026 The High Court of Orissa disposed of Manoj Das's writ petition challenging his transfer order dated 8.6.2026, which he contended violated G.A. Department guidelines and State Forest Headquarters instructions requiring minimum 1 year 6 days tenure before transfer. Rather than quashing the transfer order, the court granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh representation before the Regional Chief Conservator of Forests (Opp. Party No. 3) within 2 weeks with supporting documents, directing the authority to decide within 2 weeks thereafter. Status quo regarding the petitioner's continuance was maintained pending this decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts