DR.KHUSHBU AGARWAL vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/18421/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

Next hearing 06-Jul-2026

CNR: ODHC010446722026

Filing Number

WP(C)/26670/2026

Filing Date

17-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/18421/2026

Registration Date

18-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

CONDITION OF SERVICE ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR.KHUSHBU AGARWAL

    Adv. AVIJIT MISHRA, S.BEHERA, K.PRAJWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.DIRECTOR, MEDICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING, ODISHA

  3. 3.DIRECTOR, V.S.S. INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH, BURLA

  4. 4.DEAN AND PRINCIPAL, V.S.S. INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE AND RESEARCH, BURLA

Case History

  1. 06-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Jul-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C) 18421/2026 Dr. Khushbu Agarwal's writ petition challenging a notification issued by the State of Odisha on 19.05.2026 was heard and adjourned to the week of July 6, 2026. The court granted interim protection, directing that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner pending the next hearing, and directed the state to file its response regarding the impugned notification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/18421/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C) 18421/2026 Dr. Khushbu Agarwal's writ petition challenging a notification issued by the State of Odisha on 19.05.2026 was heard and adjourned to the week of July 6, 2026. The court granted interim protection, directing that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner pending the next hearing, and directed the state to file its response regarding the impugned notification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case