ARYARANJAN SAHOO vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/18419/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010446582026

e-Filing Number

17-06-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/26663/2026

Filing Date

17-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/18419/2026

Registration Date

18-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

CONDITION OF SERVICE ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARYARANJAN SAHOO

    Adv. MANAS PATI,M.K.PATI, S.KAR, S.S.PATI,M.K.PATI, S.KAR, S.S.PATI, M.K.PATI, S.KAR, S.S.PATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, BHUBANESWAR

  3. 3.DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, DHENKANAL

  4. 4.DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, ATHAGARH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Aryaranjan Sahoo challenging his transfer from Kapilash Range to Khuntuni Range, allowing him to petition the State Government within two weeks for cancellation or modification of the transfer order. The Court directed the State to decide on any such representation within two weeks of receipt, maintaining status quo regarding the petitioner's current posting until a decision is rendered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 17-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/18419/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Aryaranjan Sahoo challenging his transfer from Kapilash Range to Khuntuni Range, allowing him to petition the State Government within two weeks for cancellation or modification of the transfer order. The Court directed the State to decide on any such representation within two weeks of receipt, maintaining status quo regarding the petitioner's current posting until a decision is rendered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case