HARIHAR HEMBRAM @ MURMU vs STATE OF ODISHA — ABLAPL/6884/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.
CNR: ODHC010438692026
Filing Number
ABLAPL/17499/2026
Filing Date
10-Jun-2026
Registration No
ABLAPL/6884/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice V. Narasingh
Coram
Mr. Justice V. Narasingh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail Applications ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARIHAR HEMBRAM @ MURMU
Adv. HEMANTA KUMAR MOHANTA,M.PAGAL, P.MOHANTA,M.PAGAL, P.MOHANTA, M.PAGAL, P.MOHANTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
Case History
-
22-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jul-2026
For Orders - 2
Mr. Justice V. Narasingh
-
19-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice V. NarasinghView PDF
Case Summary: ABLAPL 6884/2026 Petitioner Harihar Hembram @ Murmu sought pre-arrest bail for offences under BNS Sections 316(2)/318(4)/351(2) in a case pending before the SDJM, Baripada. The High Court of Orissa granted interim protection, directing that the petitioner shall not be taken into custody until the next hearing on 22.07.2026, conditional on filing requisite documents by 24.06.2026. The Informant was ordered to be impleaded as Opposite Party No.2, with the interim order standing vacated if procedural requirements are not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABLAPL/6884/2026
Case Summary: ABLAPL 6884/2026 Petitioner Harihar Hembram @ Murmu sought pre-arrest bail for offences under BNS Sections 316(2)/318(4)/351(2) in a case pending before the SDJM, Baripada. The High Court of Orissa granted interim protection, directing that the petitioner shall not be taken into custody until the next hearing on 22.07.2026, conditional on filing requisite documents by 24.06.2026. The Informant was ordered to be impleaded as Opposite Party No.2, with the interim order standing vacated if procedural requirements are not met. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts