BIJAYA KUMAR BEHERA vs STATE OF ODISHA — ABLAPL/6863/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Next hearing 21-Jul-2026

CNR: ODHC010437822026

Filing Number

ABLAPL/17428/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

ABLAPL/6863/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

Coram

Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail Applications ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIJAYA KUMAR BEHERA

    Adv. PRASANTA KUMAR NANDA,D.SAHOO, M.SETHY,D.SAHOO, M.SETHY, D.SAHOO, M.SETHY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.GAYATRI DAS

Case History

  1. 21-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Jul-2026

    For Orders - 2

    Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice V. NarasinghView PDF

    Case Summary: ABLAPL/6863/2026 Bijaya Kumar Behera's pre-arrest bail petition was adjourned (not decided). The court issued notice to Opposite Party No.2 (Gayatri Das) with requisites due by 25.06.2026 and listed the matter for 21.07.2026. As interim protection, the court directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner if an FIR is instituted, provided proper notice procedures are followed. The petitioner must cooperate with investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABLAPL/6863/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABLAPL/6863/2026 Bijaya Kumar Behera's pre-arrest bail petition was adjourned (not decided). The court issued notice to Opposite Party No.2 (Gayatri Das) with requisites due by 25.06.2026 and listed the matter for 21.07.2026. As interim protection, the court directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner if an FIR is instituted, provided proper notice procedures are followed. The petitioner must cooperate with investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case