MAKARDHWAJ BHOI vs STATE OF ODISHA — ABLAPL/6760/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.
CNR: ODHC010433862026
e-Filing Number
08-06-2026
Filing Number
ABLAPL/17207/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
ABLAPL/6760/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Coram
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail Applications ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAKARDHWAJ BHOI
Adv. BISWAJIT RANJAN TRIPATHY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF
Case Summary: ABLAPL No.6760/2026 Makardhwaj Bhoi sought anticipatory bail for alleged wildlife protection offenses (Sections 379/411/120-B IPC and Section 51 Wildlife Protection Act 1972) after being implicated based on confessions of arrested principal accused who allegedly named him as the recipient of a killed wild animal. The petitioner withdrew the anticipatory bail application during hearing, requesting instead to surrender before the trial court. The High Court permitted the petitioner to surrender within three weeks and move for regular bail before the lower court, which shall grant bail subject to the magistrate's conditions and verification of criminal antecedents. The order is automatically revoked if any criminal antecedents are found. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 438 Cr.P.C./482 Bnss
Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABLAPL/6760/2026
Case Summary: ABLAPL No.6760/2026 Makardhwaj Bhoi sought anticipatory bail for alleged wildlife protection offenses (Sections 379/411/120-B IPC and Section 51 Wildlife Protection Act 1972) after being implicated based on confessions of arrested principal accused who allegedly named him as the recipient of a killed wild animal. The petitioner withdrew the anticipatory bail application during hearing, requesting instead to surrender before the trial court. The High Court permitted the petitioner to surrender within three weeks and move for regular bail before the lower court, which shall grant bail subject to the magistrate's conditions and verification of criminal antecedents. The order is automatically revoked if any criminal antecedents are found. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts