SUBHASIS MOHANTY vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/18144/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010433602026

Filing Number

WP(C)/26118/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/18144/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

PENSION ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBHASIS MOHANTY

    Adv. KRUSHNA CHANDRA RATH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPT., BHUBANESWAR

  3. 3.MANAGING DIRECTOR, OPTCL, BHUBANESWAR

  4. 4.MANAGING DIRECTOR, GRID CORPORATION OF ODISHA LTD., BHUBANESWAR

  5. 5.CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TPWODL CORPORATE OFFICE, BURLA

  6. 6.SECRETARY ODISHA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, BHUBANESWAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Orissa disposed of Subhasis Mohanty's writ petition seeking admission to the Old Pension Scheme 1992 and reinstatement in GPF/CPF, directing the respondent authority (Opposite Party No.5) to decide his pending representation within three months in accordance with law. The Court considered the Sri Anand Dash precedent as potentially applicable while declining to express opinion on the petition's merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/18144/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Orissa disposed of Subhasis Mohanty's writ petition seeking admission to the Old Pension Scheme 1992 and reinstatement in GPF/CPF, directing the respondent authority (Opposite Party No.5) to decide his pending representation within three months in accordance with law. The Court considered the Sri Anand Dash precedent as potentially applicable while declining to express opinion on the petition's merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case