SUJIT THAKUR vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/18273/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th June 2026.
CNR: ODHC010429332026
Filing Number
WP(C)/25893/2026
Filing Date
05-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/18273/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )
Sub-Category
PENSION ( 19 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
17-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUJIT THAKUR
Adv. KRUSHNA CHANDRA RATH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT., FINANCE DEPARTMENT, BHUBANESWAR
-
3.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, OPTCL, BHUBANESWAR
-
4.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, GRIDCO, BHUBANESWAR
-
5.CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TPWODL, SAMBALPUR
-
6.THE SECRETARY, ODISHA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, BHUBANESWAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF
The High Court of Orissa directed the respondent authority (Opposite Party No.5) to decide petitioner Sujit Thakur's representation regarding admission to the Old Pension Scheme 1992 and GPF/CPF readmission within three months, considering the applicability of the Sri Anand Dash precedent. The court disposed of the writ petition without expressing opinion on merits, essentially remitting the matter for administrative decision within a stipulated timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
-
05-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/18273/2026
The High Court of Orissa directed the respondent authority (Opposite Party No.5) to decide petitioner Sujit Thakur's representation regarding admission to the Old Pension Scheme 1992 and GPF/CPF readmission within three months, considering the applicability of the Sri Anand Dash precedent. The court disposed of the writ petition without expressing opinion on merits, essentially remitting the matter for administrative decision within a stipulated timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts