BIBEKANANDA DIKSHIT vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/18172/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010429122026

Filing Number

WP(C)/25885/2026

Filing Date

05-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/18172/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

PENSION ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIBEKANANDA DIKSHIT

    Adv. KRUSHNA CHANDRA RATH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT., FINANCE DEPT

  3. 3.MANAGING DIRECTOR, ODISHA POWER TRANSMISSION CORP. LTD., BHUBANESWAR

  4. 4.MANAGING DIRECTOR, GRIDCO, BHUBANESWAR

  5. 5.CEO, TPWODL, SAMBALPUR

  6. 6.SECRETARY ODISHA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, BHUBANESWAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C) 18172/2026 The High Court of Orissa directed the respondent (Opposite Party No.5) to decide the petitioner's representation regarding admission to the Old Pension Scheme 1992 and GPF/CPF readmission within three months, without expressing opinion on merits. The court instructed that the precedent set in *Sri Anand Dash and Others v. State of Odisha* be considered if applicable to the petitioner's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/18172/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C) 18172/2026 The High Court of Orissa directed the respondent (Opposite Party No.5) to decide the petitioner's representation regarding admission to the Old Pension Scheme 1992 and GPF/CPF readmission within three months, without expressing opinion on merits. The court instructed that the precedent set in *Sri Anand Dash and Others v. State of Odisha* be considered if applicable to the petitioner's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case