KAMALESH KUMAR PRADHAN vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/18151/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010428312026

Filing Number

WP(C)/25838/2026

Filing Date

05-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/18151/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

PENSION ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMALESH KUMAR PRADHAN

    Adv. KRUSHNA CHANDRA RATH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. FINANCE DEPARTMENT, ODISHA

  3. 3.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, ODISHA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD., BBSR

  4. 4.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, GRID CORPORATION OF ODISHA LTD., BBSR

  5. 5.CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TATA POWER WESTERN ODISHA DISTRIBUTION LTD., SAMBALPUR

  6. 6.THE SECRETARY ODISHA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, BBSR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by directing Opposite Party No.5 to decide the petitioner's pending representation regarding admission to the Old Pension Scheme 1992 and GPF/CPF readmission within three months, without prejudging the merits. The court instructed that the precedent set in Sri Anand Dash and Others v. State of Odisha be considered if applicable to the petitioner's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/18151/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by directing Opposite Party No.5 to decide the petitioner's pending representation regarding admission to the Old Pension Scheme 1992 and GPF/CPF readmission within three months, without prejudging the merits. The court instructed that the precedent set in Sri Anand Dash and Others v. State of Odisha be considered if applicable to the petitioner's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case