NIMAIN CHARAN DAS vs STATE OF ODISHA — ABLAPL/6594/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Next hearing 22-Jul-2026

CNR: ODHC010426512026

Filing Number

ABLAPL/16871/2026

Filing Date

05-Jun-2026

Registration No

ABLAPL/6594/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

Coram

Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail Applications ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NIMAIN CHARAN DAS

    Adv. DEEPAK KU SAHOO

  2. 2.MANASH RANJAN DASH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jul-2026

    For Orders - 2

    Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice V. NarasinghView PDF

    ABLAPL/6594/2026 Summary Petitioners Nimain Charan Das and Manash Ranjan Dash sought pre-arrest bail in a criminal case involving multiple BNS offences. The High Court of Orissa granted interim protection, directing that the petitioners shall not be arrested until the next hearing on 22.07.2026, to enable the State to obtain the case diary and injury report. The petitioners were required to cooperate with the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABLAPL/6594/2026

casestatus.in Summary

ABLAPL/6594/2026 Summary Petitioners Nimain Charan Das and Manash Ranjan Dash sought pre-arrest bail in a criminal case involving multiple BNS offences. The High Court of Orissa granted interim protection, directing that the petitioners shall not be arrested until the next hearing on 22.07.2026, to enable the State to obtain the case diary and injury report. The petitioners were required to cooperate with the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case