GUDUL SOY @ GUJULU SOY @ GANGADHAR SAI vs STATE OF ODISHA — ABLAPL/6577/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 438. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Next hearing 21-Jul-2026

CNR: ODHC010426492026

Filing Number

ABLAPL/16869/2026

Filing Date

05-Jun-2026

Registration No

ABLAPL/6577/2026

Registration Date

06-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

Coram

Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail Applications ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 438
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GUDUL SOY @ GUJULU SOY @ GANGADHAR SAI

    Adv. ARJUNA CHARANA BEHERA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. 21-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Jul-2026

    For Orders - 2

    Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice V. NarasinghView PDF

    Case Summary: ABLAPL No. 6577/2026 Gudul Soy sought pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No. 514 of 2026 for offences under BNS Sections 126(2), 74, 75, and 115(2). The High Court of Orissa adjourned the matter to 21.07.2026 and granted interim protection, directing that the petitioner shall not be arrested until the next hearing. The State was directed to file the case diary. The petitioner must cooperate with the investigating agency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABLAPL/6577/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABLAPL No. 6577/2026 Gudul Soy sought pre-arrest bail in connection with G.R. Case No. 514 of 2026 for offences under BNS Sections 126(2), 74, 75, and 115(2). The High Court of Orissa adjourned the matter to 21.07.2026 and granted interim protection, directing that the petitioner shall not be arrested until the next hearing. The State was directed to file the case diary. The petitioner must cooperate with the investigating agency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case