LITU @ SAHAJAD KHAN SNEHASISH BEHERA, B.SAHU vs STATE OF ODISHA — ABLAPL/6560/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010421212026

Filing Number

ABLAPL/16612/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

ABLAPL/6560/2026

Registration Date

06-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

Coram

Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail Applications ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LITU @ SAHAJAD KHAN SNEHASISH BEHERA, B.SAHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice V. NarasinghView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa rejected Litu @ Sahajad Khan's pre-arrest bail application in a case involving allegations under Sections 303(2)/3(5) of BNS 2023 and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960, citing the nature of allegations and the petitioner's criminal proclivity. However, the Court directed the petitioner to surrender before the SDJM, Hindol within one month, with instructions that any subsequent bail application be considered on merits on the same day, and if rejected, permit appeal to higher forum in the second hour. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    For Orders - 2

    Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABLAPL/6560/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa rejected Litu @ Sahajad Khan's pre-arrest bail application in a case involving allegations under Sections 303(2)/3(5) of BNS 2023 and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960, citing the nature of allegations and the petitioner's criminal proclivity. However, the Court directed the petitioner to surrender before the SDJM, Hindol within one month, with instructions that any subsequent bail application be considered on merits on the same day, and if rejected, permit appeal to higher forum in the second hour. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case