SATYABADI SAR vs STATE OF ODISHA — ABLAPL/6253/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010412152026

Filing Number

ABLAPL/16120/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

ABLAPL/6253/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Coram

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail Applications ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATYABADI SAR

    Adv. PRATAP CHANDRA MISHRA,A.K.BARIK, D.J.SAHOO, S.R.BEHERA,A.K.BARIK, D.J.SAHOO, S.R.BEHERA, A.K.BARIK, D.J.SAHOO, S.R.BEHERA

  2. 2.BHAGYALAXMI SATAPATHY @ SAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.THE IIC,DHARMASALA

  3. 3.THE IIC, SIMULIA

  4. 4.ANUSUYA PANDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF

    Case Summary: ABLAPL No. 6253 of 2026 The High Court of Orissa disposed of the anticipatory bail application filed by petitioners Satyabadi Sar and Bhagyalaxmi Satapathy, finding no imminent apprehension of arrest since no FIR had been registered. The court directed that the Arresting Officer must first explore applying the principles of Section 35(3), (4), (5) of B.N.S.S. before effecting any arrest, in accordance with the Arnesh Kumar guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 438 Cr.P.C./482 Bnss

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

  4. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABLAPL/6253/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABLAPL No. 6253 of 2026 The High Court of Orissa disposed of the anticipatory bail application filed by petitioners Satyabadi Sar and Bhagyalaxmi Satapathy, finding no imminent apprehension of arrest since no FIR had been registered. The court directed that the Arresting Officer must first explore applying the principles of Section 35(3), (4), (5) of B.N.S.S. before effecting any arrest, in accordance with the Arnesh Kumar guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case