AMAR PATI MANOJ PANIGRAHI, R.K.SARANGI, A.DASH, S.N.PRADHAN, S.R.LENKA, S.L.PADHI, vs STATE OF ODISHA — CRLMC /2230/2025

Case under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th April 2026.

CNR: ODHC010411382025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

10-06-2025

Filing Number

CRLMC /17590/2025

Filing Date

11-06-2025

Registration No

CRLMC /2230/2025

Registration Date

23-06-2025

Judge

DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

Coram

DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ANY OTHER MATTER UNDER CR.P.C. ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

AMAR PATI MANOJ PANIGRAHI, R.K.SARANGI, A.DASH, S.N.PRADHAN, S.R.LENKA, S.L.PADHI,

ARUN@ARUN KUMAR PATI

GITANJALI PATI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF ODISHA

SUKANTI PATI

Hearing History

Judge: DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

02-07-2025

FRESH ADMISSION - CRLMC U/S 482 Cr.P.C / 528 BNSS.

08-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION - CRLMC U/S 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS

31-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION - CRLMC U/S 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS

10-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION - ADJOURNED MATTERS

19-02-2026

FRESH ADMISSION - ADJOURNED MATTERS

Orders

08-04-2026
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

The High Court of Orissa quashed criminal proceedings against Amar Pati and others in Case No.459 of 2015, finding that the case and its counter-case arose from the same transaction and were intrinsically connected. The court determined that after over a decade, the investigating agency failed to submit a charge sheet, and the counter-case resulted in acquittal of the opposing parties, making conviction in the present case remote and any further proceedings a futile exercise amounting to abuse of court process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa quashed criminal proceedings against Amar Pati and others in Case No.459 of 2015, finding that the case and its counter-case arose from the same transaction and were intrinsically connected. The court determined that after over a decade, the investigating agency failed to submit a charge sheet, and the counter-case resulted in acquittal of the opposing parties, making conviction in the present case remote and any further proceedings a futile exercise amounting to abuse of court process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case