ARPITA SAMAL vs SATAE OF ODISHA — ABLAPL/6502/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th June 2026.
CNR: ODHC010408522026
e-Filing Number
27-05-2026
Filing Number
ABLAPL/15934/2026
Filing Date
27-May-2026
Registration No
ABLAPL/6502/2026
Registration Date
05-Jun-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice V. Narasingh
Coram
Mr. Justice V. Narasingh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail Applications ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
17-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARPITA SAMAL
Adv. PRASANTA KUMAR ROUTRAY,P.K.SAMAL,P.K.SAMAL, P.K.SAMAL
-
2.NABENDRA SAMAL @ NABENDRA KUMAR SAMAL
-
3.SOUMYA RANJAN SAMAL
-
4.BABUL SAMAL
-
5.RAJESH SAMAL @ RAJESH KUMAR SAMAL
-
6.NITISH BEHURA @ NITISH KUMAR BEHURA
-
7.GIRISH BEHURA @ GIRISH KUMAR BEHURA
-
8.RITIK ROSHAN BARIK
-
9.SANJAY KUMAR ROUTRAY
Respondent(s)
-
1.SATAE OF ODISHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice V. NarasinghView PDF
The High Court of Orissa granted pre-arrest bail to nine petitioners charged under BNS sections 296/351(2)/304(2)/115(2)/3(5) in a counter-FIR case, finding them allegedly falsely implicated to deflect complaints against an Anganwadi Worker. The court directed their release on bail upon surrender within three weeks and medical verification of injuries, with the condition void if grievous injury is established, and imposed restrictions against intimidating the informant while requiring cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
For Orders - 2
Mr. Justice V. Narasingh
-
27-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABLAPL/6502/2026
The High Court of Orissa granted pre-arrest bail to nine petitioners charged under BNS sections 296/351(2)/304(2)/115(2)/3(5) in a counter-FIR case, finding them allegedly falsely implicated to deflect complaints against an Anganwadi Worker. The court directed their release on bail upon surrender within three weeks and medical verification of injuries, with the condition void if grievous injury is established, and imposed restrictions against intimidating the informant while requiring cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts