CHUNURAM SINGH vs STATE OF ODISHA(VIG.) — ABLAPL/6601/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Next hearing 21-Jul-2026

CNR: ODHC010408242026

Filing Number

ABLAPL/15921/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

ABLAPL/6601/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

Coram

Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail Applications ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHUNURAM SINGH

    Adv. TARA PRASAD MOHAPATRA,M.MISHRA,M.MISHRA, M.MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA(VIG.)

Case History

  1. 21-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Jul-2026

    For Orders - 2

    Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice V. NarasinghView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: ABLAPL/6601/2026 Chunuram Singh sought pre-arrest bail in a vigilance case involving charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC Section 409. The High Court of Orissa granted interim protection, directing that the petitioner shall not be taken into custody until the next hearing on 21.07.2026, while requiring cooperation with the ongoing investigation. The matter was adjourned to allow the Vigilance Department counsel to obtain further instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABLAPL/6601/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: ABLAPL/6601/2026 Chunuram Singh sought pre-arrest bail in a vigilance case involving charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC Section 409. The High Court of Orissa granted interim protection, directing that the petitioner shall not be taken into custody until the next hearing on 21.07.2026, while requiring cooperation with the ongoing investigation. The matter was adjourned to allow the Vigilance Department counsel to obtain further instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case