TAPAS @ TAPAS RANJAN TRIPATHY vs STATE OF ODISHA — ABLAPL/6214/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010404302026

Filing Number

ABLAPL/15739/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

ABLAPL/6214/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Coram

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail Applications ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TAPAS @ TAPAS RANJAN TRIPATHY

    Adv. PRIYA RANJAN SINGH

  2. 2.SUNEET JENA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF

    Case Summary: ABLAPL 6214/2026 The High Court of Orissa disposed of the anticipatory bail application filed by Tapas Ranjan Tripathy and Suneet Jena, who faced charges under BNS 2023 sections and the MMDR Act. The petitioners' counsel withdrew the application, and the court permitted them to surrender before the trial court within three weeks to file a regular bail application, which the Magistrate shall decide subject to bail conditions, criminal antecedent verification, and Petitioner No.2 depositing Rs.3,000 security in a nationalized bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 438 Cr.P.C./482 Bnss

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

  4. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABLAPL/6214/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABLAPL 6214/2026 The High Court of Orissa disposed of the anticipatory bail application filed by Tapas Ranjan Tripathy and Suneet Jena, who faced charges under BNS 2023 sections and the MMDR Act. The petitioners' counsel withdrew the application, and the court permitted them to surrender before the trial court within three weeks to file a regular bail application, which the Magistrate shall decide subject to bail conditions, criminal antecedent verification, and Petitioner No.2 depositing Rs.3,000 security in a nationalized bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case