NARAYAN CHANDRA BEHERA vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/17266/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010395422026

Filing Number

WP(C)/24151/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/17266/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARAYAN CHANDRA BEHERA

    Adv. SUNIL KUMAR PANDA,K.PANDA, D.D.NAIK, S.K.PATEL,K.PANDA, D.D.NAIK, S.K.PATEL, K.PANDA, D.D.NAIK, S.K.PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.COLLECTOR, BALASORE

  3. 3.OFFICE OF THE TAHASILDAR, KHAIRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Orissa disposed of petitioner Narayan Chandra Behera's writ petition challenging the Collector Balasore's order withholding his provisional pension. Rather than quashing the order outright, the court granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh representation before the Collector within three weeks, with supporting documents and legal citations. The court directed the Collector to pass a lawful decision on such representation within three months and communicate the order to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/17266/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Orissa disposed of petitioner Narayan Chandra Behera's writ petition challenging the Collector Balasore's order withholding his provisional pension. Rather than quashing the order outright, the court granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh representation before the Collector within three weeks, with supporting documents and legal citations. The court directed the Collector to pass a lawful decision on such representation within three months and communicate the order to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case