BANTI @ ADITYA BEHERA vs STATE OF ODISHA — ABLAPL/5689/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 438. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010372162026

Filing Number

ABLAPL/14557/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

ABLAPL/5689/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman

Coram

Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail Applications ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 438
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BANTI @ ADITYA BEHERA

    Adv. AMIYA KUMAR TARAI,S.R.SETHI, R.N.GOUDO,S.R.SETHI, R.N.GOUDO, S.R.SETHI, R.N.GOUDO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Murahari Sri RamanView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa dismissed Banti @ Aditya Behera's anticipatory bail petition (ABLAPL 5689/2026) filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, regarding charges under Sections 296, 351(3), and 326(f) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found the petition misconceived because the alleged offences are bailable in nature, rendering an anticipatory bail application unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 438 Cr.P.C./482 Bnss

    Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman

  4. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABLAPL/5689/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa dismissed Banti @ Aditya Behera's anticipatory bail petition (ABLAPL 5689/2026) filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, regarding charges under Sections 296, 351(3), and 326(f) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found the petition misconceived because the alleged offences are bailable in nature, rendering an anticipatory bail application unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case