SANGHAMITRA BHUTIA vs STATE OF ODISHA — ABLAPL/5683/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 02nd June 2026.
CNR: ODHC010368032026
Filing Number
ABLAPL/14430/2026
Filing Date
13-May-2026
Registration No
ABLAPL/5683/2026
Registration Date
19-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
Coram
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail Applications ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
02-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANGHAMITRA BHUTIA
Adv. JYOTIRMAYA SAHOO,S.SETH,S.SETH, S.SETH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri RamanView PDF
Case Summary: ABLAPL No. 5683 of 2026 Sanghamitra Bhutia sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, apprehending arrest in connection with Talcher P.S. Case No. 250 of 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 303(2) and 61(2) of BNS 2023, Section 12 of the Orissa Minor Minerals Act 1989, and OMMC Rules 2016. The High Court disposed of the petition, finding the petitioner's apprehension of arrest misconceived since she had already complied with the notice issued under Section 35(3) of BNSS 2023 during the pendency of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 438 Cr.P.C./482 Bnss
Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman
-
13-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABLAPL/5683/2026
Case Summary: ABLAPL No. 5683 of 2026 Sanghamitra Bhutia sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, apprehending arrest in connection with Talcher P.S. Case No. 250 of 2026 for alleged offences under Sections 303(2) and 61(2) of BNS 2023, Section 12 of the Orissa Minor Minerals Act 1989, and OMMC Rules 2016. The High Court disposed of the petition, finding the petitioner's apprehension of arrest misconceived since she had already complied with the notice issued under Section 35(3) of BNSS 2023 during the pendency of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts