RASMITA SWAIN @ SMT. RASMITA SWAIN AMIT KUMAR SAHU, B.PR.NANDA, S.S.MOHAPATRA vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/4854/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010360732026

Filing Number

BLAPL/14184/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

BLAPL/4854/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

Coram

Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RASMITA SWAIN @ SMT. RASMITA SWAIN AMIT KUMAR SAHU, B.PR.NANDA, S.S.MOHAPATRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice V. NarasinghView PDF

    Case Summary: BLAPL No. 4854 of 2026 The High Court of Orissa granted bail to Rasmita Swain, who was accused of misappropriating a ₹15,00,000 Mudra Cash Loan from Odisha Grameen Bank by removing hypothecated stock and absconding. Despite the State's opposition citing her similar antecedent, Justice V. Narasingh allowed her release on bail considering she is a woman with a disabled husband, subject to conditions fixed by the trial court to ensure her presence during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    For Orders - 1

    Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice V. NarasinghView PDF

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BLAPL/4854/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: BLAPL No. 4854 of 2026 The High Court of Orissa granted bail to Rasmita Swain, who was accused of misappropriating a ₹15,00,000 Mudra Cash Loan from Odisha Grameen Bank by removing hypothecated stock and absconding. Despite the State's opposition citing her similar antecedent, Justice V. Narasingh allowed her release on bail considering she is a woman with a disabled husband, subject to conditions fixed by the trial court to ensure her presence during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case