RAJESH KUMAR MOHANTY @ RAJU vs STATE OF ODISHA — BLAPL/4832/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010357892026

Filing Number

BLAPL/14067/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

BLAPL/4832/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman

Coram

Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Regular Bail Applications ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH KUMAR MOHANTY @ RAJU

    Adv. ANUGRAHA NARAYAN SAMANTRAY,M.C.MOHANTY,M.C.MOHANTY, M.C.MOHANTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Murahari Sri RamanView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa granted bail to Rajesh Kumar Mohanty, who was arrested for illegal possession of 10 grams of brown sugar under the NDPS Act. The court found that since the quantity seized was below commercial quantity, Section 37 of the NDPS Act did not apply, and considering his lack of criminal antecedents and custodial period, bail was warranted. Release was granted subject to conditions including mandatory court attendance, non-tampering with evidence, and no commission of further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Orders - Fresh Bail Applications U/S 439 Cr.P.C / 483 Bnss.

    Mr. Justice Murahari Sri Raman

  4. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BLAPL/4832/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa granted bail to Rajesh Kumar Mohanty, who was arrested for illegal possession of 10 grams of brown sugar under the NDPS Act. The court found that since the quantity seized was below commercial quantity, Section 37 of the NDPS Act did not apply, and considering his lack of criminal antecedents and custodial period, bail was warranted. Release was granted subject to conditions including mandatory court attendance, non-tampering with evidence, and no commission of further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case