PRAFULLA KUMAR MOHAPATRA M/S KRISHNA CHANDRA SAHU , S.PRADHAN, D.K.MAHALIK, A.K.MISHRA vs SARAT KUMAR BAG, SPL. L.A.R AND R.O, RENGALI IRRIGATION PROJECT, BAGHUABOL — CONTC /2231/2025

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 11,12. Next hearing: 01st May 2026.

CNR: ODHC010335912025

Next Hearing

01st May 2026

e-Filing Number

08-05-2025

Filing Number

CONTC /19477/2025

Filing Date

08-05-2025

Registration No

CONTC /2231/2025

Registration Date

13-05-2025

Judge

MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

Coram

MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT MATTERS ( 8 )

Sub-Category

OTHER CIVIL CONTEMPT MATTERS ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Acts & Sections

CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 Section 11,12

Petitioner(s)

PRAFULLA KUMAR MOHAPATRA M/S KRISHNA CHANDRA SAHU , S.PRADHAN, D.K.MAHALIK, A.K.MISHRA

Respondent(s)

SARAT KUMAR BAG, SPL. L.A.R AND R.O, RENGALI IRRIGATION PROJECT, BAGHUABOL

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

13-03-2026

FRESH ADMISSION - CONTEMPT MATTERS

01-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION - CONTEMPT MATTERS

10-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION - CONTEMPT MATTERS

Orders

15-04-2026
MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

Summary: The High Court of Orissa dismissed the contempt petition but issued a conditional order in CONTC No. 2231 of 2025 (dated 15.04.2026). The Court found that the opposite party (Sarat Kumar Bag) failed to comply with a previous order (30.11.2024) requiring disbursement of 2nd RACP & 3rd MACP benefits to petitioner Prafulla Kumar Mohapatra, despite similar benefits being granted to similarly placed persons. The Court directed that if compliance is not achieved by the next date, the Contemnor shall appear in person with explanation, and listed the matter for 01.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Orissa dismissed the contempt petition but issued a conditional order in CONTC No. 2231 of 2025 (dated 15.04.2026). The Court found that the opposite party (Sarat Kumar Bag) failed to comply with a previous order (30.11.2024) requiring disbursement of 2nd RACP & 3rd MACP benefits to petitioner Prafulla Kumar Mohapatra, despite similar benefits being granted to similarly placed persons. The Court directed that if compliance is not achieved by the next date, the Contemnor shall appear in person with explanation, and listed the matter for 01.05.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case