MURALI MOHAN PRADHAN vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/13665/2023

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010330072023

Filing Number

WP(C)/13665/2023

Filing Date

01-May-2023

Registration No

WP(C)/13665/2023

Registration Date

02-May-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Coram

Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )

Sub-Category

SUIT FOR DECLARATION.(TITLE/DAMAGES/RECOVERY ETC.) ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MURALI MOHAN PRADHAN

    Adv. RAMA CHANDRA JENA,M.PADHI,M.PADHI, M.PADHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.COLLECTOR, BALASORE

  3. 3.TAHASILDAR, JALESWAR

  4. 4.JYOTSHNA RANI SAHU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition filed by Murali Mohan Pradhan as infructuous. The court found that while the petitioner sought to quash a Tahasildar's order rejecting his time petition and demanded a fresh hearing in a demarcation case, the petition contained defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter that remained uncorrected despite considerable time elapsed since 2023. The court concluded that the petitioner's lack of diligent pursuit of the matter suggested the cause of action no longer survived. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

  4. 01-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/13665/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition filed by Murali Mohan Pradhan as infructuous. The court found that while the petitioner sought to quash a Tahasildar's order rejecting his time petition and demanded a fresh hearing in a demarcation case, the petition contained defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter that remained uncorrected despite considerable time elapsed since 2023. The court concluded that the petitioner's lack of diligent pursuit of the matter suggested the cause of action no longer survived. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case