RISHIKESH SAHOO vs STATE OF ODISHA — CRLMC/1232/2022
Case under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010294062022
Filing Number
CRLMC/1232/2022
Filing Date
06-May-2022
Registration No
CRLMC/1232/2022
Registration Date
09-May-2022
Judge
Miss Justice Savitri Ratho
Coram
Miss Justice Savitri Ratho
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )
Sub-Category
ANY OTHER MATTER UNDER CR.P.C. ( 21 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RISHIKESH SAHOO
Adv. NARAYAN PRASAD PARIJA,A.K.MOHANTY, S.PARIJA, S.MAHUNTA,A.K.MOHANTY, S.PARIJA, S.MAHUNTA, A.K.MOHANTY, S.PARIJA, S.MAHUNTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.RASHMA SUBUDHI @ SAHOO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Miss Justice Savitri RathoView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Miss Justice Savitri RathoView PDF
The Orissa High Court quashed criminal proceedings (G.R. Case No. 1597 of 2017) against Rishikesh Sahoo arising from matrimonial disputes, after his marriage was dissolved by mutual consent divorce in January 2022. The court found that since the parties had settled their differences, paid agreed compensation of Rs. 25 lakhs, and were living separately, continuing the criminal prosecution would serve no useful purpose and would constitute abuse of judicial process, despite one charge involving non-compoundable Section 307 (attempt to murder). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Jan-2025
For Orders - Crlmc U/S 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 Bnss
Mr. Justice Sibo Sankar Mishra
-
06-Jan-2025
Mr. Justice Sibo Sankar MishraView PDF
-
05-Jul-2023
Dr. Justice S. Muralidhar (Cj)View PDF
-
05-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-May-2022
Case filed
Registration No. CRLMC/1232/2022
The Orissa High Court quashed criminal proceedings (G.R. Case No. 1597 of 2017) against Rishikesh Sahoo arising from matrimonial disputes, after his marriage was dissolved by mutual consent divorce in January 2022. The court found that since the parties had settled their differences, paid agreed compensation of Rs. 25 lakhs, and were living separately, continuing the criminal prosecution would serve no useful purpose and would constitute abuse of judicial process, despite one charge involving non-compoundable Section 307 (attempt to murder). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts