LAKHMI NARAYAN DAS DAMODAR PATRA, A.K.SAHOO vs BIRANCHI NARAYAN DAS — WP(C)/10687/2022

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010268922022

Filing Number

WP(C)/10687/2022

Filing Date

26-Apr-2022

Registration No

WP(C)/10687/2022

Registration Date

30-Apr-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Coram

Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )

Sub-Category

SUIT FOR DECLARATION.(TITLE/DAMAGES/RECOVERY ETC.) ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAKHMI NARAYAN DAS DAMODAR PATRA, A.K.SAHOO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIRANCHI NARAYAN DAS

  2. 2.RABI NARAYAN DAS

  3. 3.AKSHAYA KUMAR PATRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, finding that the petitioner's prayer for early disposal of Civil Suit No. 576/2014 lacked merit since the application was filed in 2022 and no cause of action survived at the time of judgment. The court held that the petitioner's request was merely an "innocuous prayer" without substantive basis for judicial intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    For Orders

    Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

  4. 26-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/10687/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, finding that the petitioner's prayer for early disposal of Civil Suit No. 576/2014 lacked merit since the application was filed in 2022 and no cause of action survived at the time of judgment. The court held that the petitioner's request was merely an "innocuous prayer" without substantive basis for judicial intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case