RAMESH CHANDRA SAHOO vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/10675/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: ODHC010259142026

Filing Number

WP(C)/15432/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/10675/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Coram

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

CONDITION OF SERVICE ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH CHANDRA SAHOO

    Adv. SWAPNIL ROY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF HIGHER EDUCATION, ODISHA, BHUBANESWAR

  3. 3.SUB COLLECTOR, BHAWANIPATNA CUM PRESIDENT OF THE G.B OF MAA HIRA NEELA DEGREE MAHAVIDYALAYA

  4. 4.TANAMANI THAKUR

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Orissa found prima facie that the State violated a prior court order by passing an impugned order dated 19.03.2026 without first considering the petitioner's representation as directed. The court adjourned the matter to the week of 20.04.2026, granted the State one week to obtain specific instructions, and as an interim measure, kept the impugned order in abeyance pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/10675/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Orissa found prima facie that the State violated a prior court order by passing an impugned order dated 19.03.2026 without first considering the petitioner's representation as directed. The court adjourned the matter to the week of 20.04.2026, granted the State one week to obtain specific instructions, and as an interim measure, kept the impugned order in abeyance pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case