M/S S. S. URMILA TRADERS, CHUDAMANI vs THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER BANK OF MAHARASHTRA, ZONAL OFFICE, BHUBANESWAR — WP(C)/10632/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010258982026
e-Filing Number
08-04-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/15417/2026
Filing Date
08-04-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/10632/2026
Registration Date
08-04-2026
Judge
MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S. , MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
Coram
MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S. , MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 26 )
Sub-Category
BANKS MORTGAGE DISPUTES ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S S. S. URMILA TRADERS, CHUDAMANI
Adv. TATHAGATA SAHOO, N.K.SAHOO
M/S. DAS ENTERPRISES, BALASORE
Respondent(s)
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER BANK OF MAHARASHTRA, ZONAL OFFICE, BHUBANESWAR
BRANCH MANAGER, BANK OF MAHARASHTRA, BALASORE
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S. , MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
The Orissa High Court disposed of the petition by granting S.S. Urmila Traders four weeks (in four equal weekly installments) to pay the outstanding settlement amount of Rs. 9 lakh plus accrued interest to Bank of Maharashtra, suspending coercive recovery action during this period. If the petitioner fails to remit the amount within the stipulated timeframe without extension, the bank is at liberty to proceed with all coercive recovery actions under the SARFAESI Act 2002. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Orissa High Court disposed of the petition by granting S.S. Urmila Traders four weeks (in four equal weekly installments) to pay the outstanding settlement amount of Rs. 9 lakh plus accrued interest to Bank of Maharashtra, suspending coercive recovery action during this period. If the petitioner fails to remit the amount within the stipulated timeframe without extension, the bank is at liberty to proceed with all coercive recovery actions under the SARFAESI Act 2002. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts