M/S. RAJESH KUMAR SECURITY AGENCY, KHURDA vs GOVERNMANT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF TOURISM, NEW DELHI — WP(C)/10672/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010256772026
Filing Number
WP(C)/15262/2026
Filing Date
07-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/10672/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice B. P. Routray
Coram
Mr. Justice B. P. Routray
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LABOUR MATTERS ( 18 )
Sub-Category
CONTRACT LABOUR ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. RAJESH KUMAR SECURITY AGENCY, KHURDA
Adv. DILLIP KUMAR PRADHAN,SK.MEHERULLA, D.ACHARYA,SK.MEHERULLA, D.ACHARYA, SK.MEHERULLA, D.ACHARYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVERNMANT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF TOURISM, NEW DELHI
-
2.INDIAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,(ITDC),OFFICE, NEW DELHI
-
3.HOTEL KALINGA ASHOK, A UNIT OF ITDC LTD., BHUBANESWAR
-
4.DIRECTORATE GENERAL RESETTLEMENT(DGR), GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, NEW DELHI
-
5.DIRECTORATE RESETTLEMENT ZONE(DRZ)(EAST), WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice B. P. RoutrayView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition filed by Rajesh Kumar Security Agency against the Government of India and Hotel Kalinga Ashok, holding that the petition was not entertainable as it involved a contractual dispute between private parties, which falls outside the scope of writ jurisdiction. The court directed the petitioner to pursue the matter through the appropriate civil forum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice B. P. Routray
-
07-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/10672/2026
Summary: The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition filed by Rajesh Kumar Security Agency against the Government of India and Hotel Kalinga Ashok, holding that the petition was not entertainable as it involved a contractual dispute between private parties, which falls outside the scope of writ jurisdiction. The court directed the petitioner to pursue the matter through the appropriate civil forum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts