M/S. RAJESH KUMAR SECURITY AGENCY, KHURDA vs GOVERNMANT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF TOURISM, NEW DELHI — WP(C)/10672/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

CNR: ODHC010256772026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP(C)/15262/2026

Filing Date

07-04-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/10672/2026

Registration Date

08-04-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

Coram

MR. JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LABOUR MATTERS ( 18 )

Sub-Category

CONTRACT LABOUR ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

M/S. RAJESH KUMAR SECURITY AGENCY, KHURDA

Adv. DILLIP KUMAR PRADHAN,SK.MEHERULLA, D.ACHARYA,SK.MEHERULLA, D.ACHARYA, SK.MEHERULLA, D.ACHARYA

Respondent(s)

GOVERNMANT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF TOURISM, NEW DELHI

INDIAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,(ITDC),OFFICE, NEW DELHI

HOTEL KALINGA ASHOK, A UNIT OF ITDC LTD., BHUBANESWAR

DIRECTORATE GENERAL RESETTLEMENT(DGR), GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, NEW DELHI

DIRECTORATE RESETTLEMENT ZONE(DRZ)(EAST), WEST BENGAL

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

09-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

09-04-2026
MR. JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

Summary: The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition filed by Rajesh Kumar Security Agency against the Government of India and Hotel Kalinga Ashok, holding that the petition was not entertainable as it involved a contractual dispute between private parties, which falls outside the scope of writ jurisdiction. The court directed the petitioner to pursue the matter through the appropriate civil forum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition filed by Rajesh Kumar Security Agency against the Government of India and Hotel Kalinga Ashok, holding that the petition was not entertainable as it involved a contractual dispute between private parties, which falls outside the scope of writ jurisdiction. The court directed the petitioner to pursue the matter through the appropriate civil forum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case