SRIDHAR SAHU M/S.DHANANJAYA MUND, R.K.ACHARYA,S.N.PADHEE,P.K.BEHERA vs APPELLATE AUTHORITY — WP(C)/7345/2014
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010256762014
Filing Number
WP(C)/7345/2014
Filing Date
09-Apr-2014
Registration No
WP(C)/7345/2014
Registration Date
09-Apr-2014
Judge
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
COMPENSATION MATTER ( 7 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO TELEPHONE, ELECTRICITY,WATER ETC. ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 09-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRIDHAR SAHU M/S.DHANANJAYA MUND, R.K.ACHARYA,S.N.PADHEE,P.K.BEHERA
Respondent(s)
-
1.APPELLATE AUTHORITY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition filed by Sridhar Sahu on the ground that the petitioner's counsel received no instructions from his client. However, the court granted liberty to revive the petition within one month, allowing the petitioner an opportunity to pursue the matter with proper instructions from the client. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
-
24-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF
-
20-Mar-2026
For Admission
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
-
09-Mar-2026
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF
-
13-Dec-2025
Mr. Justice Gourishankar SatapathyView PDF
-
15-Apr-2014
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2014
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice B.k.patel
-
15-Apr-2014
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice B.k.patel
-
09-Apr-2014
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/7345/2014
The High Court of Orissa dismissed the writ petition filed by Sridhar Sahu on the ground that the petitioner's counsel received no instructions from his client. However, the court granted liberty to revive the petition within one month, allowing the petitioner an opportunity to pursue the matter with proper instructions from the client. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts