RABINDRA KU. JENA M/S.MANAS CHAND, D.R.PARIDA, S.KHAN vs SANKARSHAN JENA — CRLREV/454/2003

Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Oct-2011

CNR: ODHC010253892003

Filing Number

CRLREV/454/2003

Filing Date

23-Jun-2003

Registration No

CRLREV/454/2003

Registration Date

23-Jun-2003

Judge

Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

Coram

Mr. Justice V. Narasingh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ANY OTHER MATTER UNDER CR.P.C. ( 21 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RABINDRA KU. JENA M/S.MANAS CHAND, D.R.PARIDA, S.KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANKARSHAN JENA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice V. NarasinghView PDF

    Case Summary The High Court of Orissa dismissed Rabindra Kumar Jena's criminal revision challenging his conviction under Section 323 IPC (voluntarily causing hurt). The court found the lower courts' appreciation of evidence was not perverse and upheld the conviction with release under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958. The court clarified that Section 12 of the Probation Act removes disqualifications from conviction, so the petitioner suffers no stigma from the release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Oct-2011

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 17-Oct-2011

    For Hearing

    Mr. Justice H.s.bhalla

  5. 23-Jun-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRLREV/454/2003

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The High Court of Orissa dismissed Rabindra Kumar Jena's criminal revision challenging his conviction under Section 323 IPC (voluntarily causing hurt). The court found the lower courts' appreciation of evidence was not perverse and upheld the conviction with release under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958. The court clarified that Section 12 of the Probation Act removes disqualifications from conviction, so the petitioner suffers no stigma from the release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case