MINAKSHI SAHOO vs THE REGIONAL MANAGER,UNION BANK OF INDIA,CUTTACK — WA/560/2026

Case under Letter Patents of Patna H.c. Act Section 10. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: ODHC010253802026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

WA/15085/2026

Filing Date

07-04-2026

Registration No

WA/560/2026

Registration Date

09-04-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK , MR. JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA

Coram

MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK , MR. JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Acts & Sections

Letter Patents of Patna H.c. Act Section 10

Petitioner(s)

MINAKSHI SAHOO

Adv. SRINIVAS MOHANTY,K.PATRA,S.R.MOHANTY,E.DASH,K.PATRA,S.R.MOHANTY,E.DASH, K.PATRA,S.R.MOHANTY,E.DASH

Respondent(s)

THE REGIONAL MANAGER,UNION BANK OF INDIA,CUTTACK

BRANCH MANAGER,UNION BANK OF INDIA

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK , MR. JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA

09-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

10-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

10-04-2026
MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK,MR. JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA

Appeal Dismissed — The High Court of Orissa rejected appellant Minakshi Sahoo's challenge to the Single Judge's order requiring her to deposit Rs. 75,000 with Union Bank of India to release her mortgaged TATA Tigor vehicle. The court found no illegality in the lower court's direction and confirmed the deposit amount (covering defaulted EMIs, legal expenses, and unpaid interest) would be set off against her total loan liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Appeal Dismissed — The High Court of Orissa rejected appellant Minakshi Sahoo's challenge to the Single Judge's order requiring her to deposit Rs. 75,000 with Union Bank of India to release her mortgaged TATA Tigor vehicle. The court found no illegality in the lower court's direction and confirmed the deposit amount (covering defaulted EMIs, legal expenses, and unpaid interest) would be set off against her total loan liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case