MINAKSHI SAHOO vs THE REGIONAL MANAGER,UNION BANK OF INDIA,CUTTACK — WA/560/2026

Case under Letter Patents of Patna H.c. Act Section 10. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: ODHC010253802026

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

WA/15085/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

WA/560/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Manash Ranjan Pathak , Mr. Justice Sibo Sankar Mishra

Coram

Mr. Justice Manash Ranjan Pathak , Mr. Justice Sibo Sankar Mishra

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Letter Patents of Patna H.c. Act Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MINAKSHI SAHOO

    Adv. SRINIVAS MOHANTY,K.PATRA,S.R.MOHANTY,E.DASH,K.PATRA,S.R.MOHANTY,E.DASH, K.PATRA,S.R.MOHANTY,E.DASH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE REGIONAL MANAGER,UNION BANK OF INDIA,CUTTACK

  2. 2.BRANCH MANAGER,UNION BANK OF INDIA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Manash Ranjan Pathak,mr. Justice Sibo Sankar MishraView PDF

    Appeal Dismissed — The High Court of Orissa rejected appellant Minakshi Sahoo's challenge to the Single Judge's order requiring her to deposit Rs. 75,000 with Union Bank of India to release her mortgaged TATA Tigor vehicle. The court found no illegality in the lower court's direction and confirmed the deposit amount (covering defaulted EMIs, legal expenses, and unpaid interest) would be set off against her total loan liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Manash Ranjan Pathak , Mr. Justice Sashikanta Mishra

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Manash Ranjan Pathak,mr. Justice Sashikanta MishraView PDF

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/560/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Appeal Dismissed — The High Court of Orissa rejected appellant Minakshi Sahoo's challenge to the Single Judge's order requiring her to deposit Rs. 75,000 with Union Bank of India to release her mortgaged TATA Tigor vehicle. The court found no illegality in the lower court's direction and confirmed the deposit amount (covering defaulted EMIs, legal expenses, and unpaid interest) would be set off against her total loan liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case