ASWINI KUMAR MIRDHA vs STATE BANK OF INDIA — WP(C)/10547/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010252992026

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/15035/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/10547/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

Coram

Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASWINI KUMAR MIRDHA

    Adv. KANANBALA ROY CHOUDHURY,G.K.ROY CHOUDHURY,G.K.ROY CHOUDHURY, G.K.ROY CHOUDHURY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE BANK OF INDIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice B. P. RoutrayView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa allowed the petitioner's writ petition against State Bank of India's freezing of his bank account without notice regarding an alleged unauthorized transaction of Rs.12,008/-. The court directed the bank to permit the petitioner to operate his account while maintaining a lien of Rs.12,008/- pending further instructions from the police authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice B. P. Routray

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice B. P. RoutrayView PDF

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/10547/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa allowed the petitioner's writ petition against State Bank of India's freezing of his bank account without notice regarding an alleged unauthorized transaction of Rs.12,008/-. The court directed the bank to permit the petitioner to operate his account while maintaining a lien of Rs.12,008/- pending further instructions from the police authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case