PRASANTA KUMAR PATRA vs NARENDRA ROUT — CMP/599/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010252402026
Filing Number
CMP/14999/2026
Filing Date
06-04-2026
Registration No
CMP/599/2026
Registration Date
08-04-2026
Judge
MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
Coram
MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )
Sub-Category
SUIT FOR DECLARATION.(TITLE/DAMAGES/RECOVERY ETC.) ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRASANTA KUMAR PATRA
Adv. SUVASHISH PATTANAIK,B.BAIVAB, S.P.BISWAL, D.MISHRA,B.BAIVAB, S.P.BISWAL, D.MISHRA, B.BAIVAB, S.P.BISWAL, D.MISHRA
Respondent(s)
NARENDRA ROUT
CHAMPA DEBI
SANKHI DEBI
BISWAJIT ROUT
SATYAJIT ROUT
MAMATA ROUT
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA
FRESH ADMISSION 1
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION 1 |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Orissa directed the trial court to expedite hearing of the plaintiff's injunction application (Order 39 Rule 1 & 2, CPC) within eight weeks, recognizing the urgency to prevent defendants from creating third-party interests over the disputed property. As interim protection, parties are restrained from creating any third-party interest for eight weeks, though this interim arrangement shall not influence the trial court's final decision on the injunction application's merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Orissa directed the trial court to expedite hearing of the plaintiff's injunction application (Order 39 Rule 1 & 2, CPC) within eight weeks, recognizing the urgency to prevent defendants from creating third-party interests over the disputed property. As interim protection, parties are restrained from creating any third-party interest for eight weeks, though this interim arrangement shall not influence the trial court's final decision on the injunction application's merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts