PRASANTA KUMAR PATRA vs NARENDRA ROUT — CMP/599/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010252402026

Filing Number

CMP/14999/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CMP/599/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Coram

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )

Sub-Category

SUIT FOR DECLARATION.(TITLE/DAMAGES/RECOVERY ETC.) ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRASANTA KUMAR PATRA

    Adv. SUVASHISH PATTANAIK,B.BAIVAB, S.P.BISWAL, D.MISHRA,B.BAIVAB, S.P.BISWAL, D.MISHRA, B.BAIVAB, S.P.BISWAL, D.MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARENDRA ROUT

  2. 2.CHAMPA DEBI

  3. 3.SANKHI DEBI

  4. 4.BISWAJIT ROUT

  5. 5.SATYAJIT ROUT

  6. 6.MAMATA ROUT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Orissa directed the trial court to expedite hearing of the plaintiff's injunction application (Order 39 Rule 1 & 2, CPC) within eight weeks, recognizing the urgency to prevent defendants from creating third-party interests over the disputed property. As interim protection, parties are restrained from creating any third-party interest for eight weeks, though this interim arrangement shall not influence the trial court's final decision on the injunction application's merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission 1

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/599/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Orissa directed the trial court to expedite hearing of the plaintiff's injunction application (Order 39 Rule 1 & 2, CPC) within eight weeks, recognizing the urgency to prevent defendants from creating third-party interests over the disputed property. As interim protection, parties are restrained from creating any third-party interest for eight weeks, though this interim arrangement shall not influence the trial court's final decision on the injunction application's merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case