NIRMALA NAYAK vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/10564/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010250732026

Filing Number

WP(C)/14912/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/10564/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Coram

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

03-TRANSFER ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NIRMALA NAYAK

    Adv. KUNAL KUMAR SWAIN,K.SWAIN, J.R.KHUNTIA,K.SWAIN, J.R.KHUNTIA, K.SWAIN, J.R.KHUNTIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.DIRECTOR,SECONDARY EDUCATION, BHUBANESWAR

  3. 3.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, CUTTACK

  4. 4.MANAGING COMMITTEE OF RADHAKANTA HIGH SCHOOL, NUAGAON

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by directing the Director of Secondary Education, Odisha to consider and decide the petitioner's representation challenging her transfer order within four weeks, requiring a reasoned decision. The court suspended implementation of the transfer order for six weeks, allowing the petitioner—a block grant Hindi teacher with 35 years of service—time for administrative relief before the impugned transfer takes effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/10564/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by directing the Director of Secondary Education, Odisha to consider and decide the petitioner's representation challenging her transfer order within four weeks, requiring a reasoned decision. The court suspended implementation of the transfer order for six weeks, allowing the petitioner—a block grant Hindi teacher with 35 years of service—time for administrative relief before the impugned transfer takes effect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case