ASHOK BEHARI SINGH vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/10315/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010241762026
Filing Number
WP(C)/14337/2026
Filing Date
31-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/10315/2026
Registration Date
06-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Coram
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )
Sub-Category
CONDITION OF SERVICE ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHOK BEHARI SINGH
Adv. GOURI MOHAN RATH,S.S.PADHY, P.MOHANTY, S.MOHAPATRA,S.S.PADHY, P.MOHANTY, S.MOHAPATRA, S.S.PADHY, P.MOHANTY, S.MOHAPATRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF ODISHA
-
2.OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, JN INDOOR STADIUM, CUTTACK
-
3.S.D.O (G.E.D), IN-CHARGE, JN INDOOR STADIUM, CUTTACK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Ashok Behari Singh seeking absorption against Group-D vacant posts and arrear salary. Instead of granting the petition directly, the court granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh representation before the State of Odisha within three weeks with supporting documents, and directed the State to pass a lawful decision within three months of receiving such representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission
Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
-
31-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/10315/2026
Summary: The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Ashok Behari Singh seeking absorption against Group-D vacant posts and arrear salary. Instead of granting the petition directly, the court granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh representation before the State of Odisha within three weeks with supporting documents, and directed the State to pass a lawful decision within three months of receiving such representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts