SK. AINUL@AIMUL vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/10526/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010239622026
Filing Number
WP(C)/14214/2026
Filing Date
31-03-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/10526/2026
Registration Date
07-04-2026
Judge
MR. JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
Coram
MR. JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 20 )
Sub-Category
ORISSA PREVENTION OF LAND ENCROACHMENT ACT ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SK. AINUL@AIMUL
Adv. AMIT PRASAD BOSE,A.PRASAD, S.K.PANIGRAHI,A.PRASAD, S.K.PANIGRAHI, A.PRASAD, S.K.PANIGRAHI
Respondent(s)
STATE OF ODISHA
THE COLLECTOR CUM DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BALASORE
THE SUB COLLECTOR, BALASORE,
THE TAHASILDAR, BALASORE,
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
The High Court of Orissa allowed the petitioner's counsel to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal before the appellate forum. The court granted the petitioner 30 days to prefer an appeal and directed that limitation be considered liberally, with protection from eviction from the case land during this period or until appeal filing, whichever is earlier. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Orissa allowed the petitioner's counsel to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal before the appellate forum. The court granted the petitioner 30 days to prefer an appeal and directed that limitation be considered liberally, with protection from eviction from the case land during this period or until appeal filing, whichever is earlier. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts