SUSHIL @ SUSIL KUMAR PATRA SUBRAT KUMAR KAR, S.S.DAS, J.K.SAHOO vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/10556/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010238522026

Filing Number

WP(C)/14149/2026

Filing Date

31-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/10556/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Coram

Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )

Sub-Category

03-TRANSFER ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUSHIL @ SUSIL KUMAR PATRA SUBRAT KUMAR KAR, S.S.DAS, J.K.SAHOO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF ODISHA

  2. 2.DIRECTORATE OF PRISONS AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, GOVT. OF ODISHA, BHUBANESWAR

  3. 3.ADDL. D.G. OF PRISONS DIRECTORATE, BHUBANESWAR

  4. 4.SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT CIRCLE JAIL, BARIPADA, MAYURBHANJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna SatapathyView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Sushil Kumar Patra, who sought to quash an office order and be transferred to work at Rairangpur Sub-Jail. The court directed the State (Opposite Party No. 2) to consider the petitioner's representation within three months in accordance with law, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. The petition was disposed of by mutual agreement of both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/10556/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition filed by Sushil Kumar Patra, who sought to quash an office order and be transferred to work at Rairangpur Sub-Jail. The court directed the State (Opposite Party No. 2) to consider the petitioner's representation within three months in accordance with law, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. The petition was disposed of by mutual agreement of both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case