ARCHANAMAYI NAYAK vs STATE OF ODISHA — WP(C)/10428/2026
Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: ODHC010237192026
e-Filing Number
30-03-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/14052/2026
Filing Date
30-03-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/10428/2026
Registration Date
07-04-2026
Judge
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Coram
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 31 )
Sub-Category
REGULARISATION OF AD-HOC EMPLOYEES ETC. ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARCHANAMAYI NAYAK
Adv. KRISHNA CHANDRA SAHU,S.PRADHAN, D.K.MAHALIK, P.ACHARYA,S.PRADHAN, D.K.MAHALIK, P.ACHARYA, S.PRADHAN, D.K.MAHALIK, P.ACHARYA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF ODISHA
DIRECTOR, FAMILY WELFARE, BHUBANESWAR
CHIEF DISTRICT MEDICAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICER,. PHULBANI
Hearing History
Judge: MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Summary: The High Court of Orissa disposed of Archanamayi Nayak's writ petition seeking regularization as a Regular MPHW(F) after six years of contractual service, without granting the relief sought. Instead, the court granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh representation before the State (Opposite Party No. 2) within three weeks, with supporting documents and citations. The court directed the State to pass a lawful decision within three months of receiving such representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The High Court of Orissa disposed of Archanamayi Nayak's writ petition seeking regularization as a Regular MPHW(F) after six years of contractual service, without granting the relief sought. Instead, the court granted the petitioner liberty to file a fresh representation before the State (Opposite Party No. 2) within three weeks, with supporting documents and citations. The court directed the State to pass a lawful decision within three months of receiving such representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts