ARUN KUMAR BISWAL AMARTYA MISHRA vs AUTHORISED OFFICER OF ICICI BANK LIMITED, KHURDA — WP(C)/10418/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010236322026

Filing Number

WP(C)/13993/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/10418/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Dixit K.S. , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Coram

Mr. Justice Dixit K.S. , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 26 )

Sub-Category

RECOVERY OF LOAN. ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARUN KUMAR BISWAL AMARTYA MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AUTHORISED OFFICER OF ICICI BANK LIMITED, KHURDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Dixit K.s.,mr. Justice Chittaranjan DashView PDF

    The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by allowing the borrower to repay the housing loan through a structured installment plan: 30% within three working days, followed by the remaining 70% in three equal installments over three months. Upon payment of the initial 30%, the bank must return possession of the mortgaged property. If the borrower fails to comply with the payment schedule, the bank is permitted to resume all coercive recovery actions under the SARFAESI Act 2002. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Mr. Justice Dixit K.S. , Mr. Justice Chittaranjan Dash

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/10418/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by allowing the borrower to repay the housing loan through a structured installment plan: 30% within three working days, followed by the remaining 70% in three equal installments over three months. Upon payment of the initial 30%, the bank must return possession of the mortgaged property. If the borrower fails to comply with the payment schedule, the bank is permitted to resume all coercive recovery actions under the SARFAESI Act 2002. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case