ARUN KUMAR BISWAL AMARTYA MISHRA vs AUTHORISED OFFICER OF ICICI BANK LIMITED, KHURDA — WP(C)/10418/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

CNR: ODHC010236322026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP(C)/13993/2026

Filing Date

30-03-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/10418/2026

Registration Date

06-04-2026

Judge

MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S. , MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

Coram

MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S. , MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 26 )

Sub-Category

RECOVERY OF LOAN. ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

ARUN KUMAR BISWAL AMARTYA MISHRA

Respondent(s)

AUTHORISED OFFICER OF ICICI BANK LIMITED, KHURDA

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S. , MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

09-04-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

09-04-2026
MR. JUSTICE DIXIT K.S.,MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by allowing the borrower to repay the housing loan through a structured installment plan: 30% within three working days, followed by the remaining 70% in three equal installments over three months. Upon payment of the initial 30%, the bank must return possession of the mortgaged property. If the borrower fails to comply with the payment schedule, the bank is permitted to resume all coercive recovery actions under the SARFAESI Act 2002. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition by allowing the borrower to repay the housing loan through a structured installment plan: 30% within three working days, followed by the remaining 70% in three equal installments over three months. Upon payment of the initial 30%, the bank must return possession of the mortgaged property. If the borrower fails to comply with the payment schedule, the bank is permitted to resume all coercive recovery actions under the SARFAESI Act 2002. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case