SABITA DHALA @ SABITA SWAIN vs ALEKHA CHANDRA BISWAL — CMP/593/2026

Case under Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: ODHC010232962026

e-Filing Number

30-03-2026

Filing Number

CMP/13798/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CMP/593/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Coram

Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTER ( 28 )

Sub-Category

SUIT FOR DECLARATION.(TITLE/DAMAGES/RECOVERY ETC.) ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India, 1950 Section 226,227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SABITA DHALA @ SABITA SWAIN

    Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SAHOO,S.MISRA,S.MISRA, S.MISRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ALEKHA CHANDRA BISWAL

  2. 2.SABITA DHALA

  3. 3.SUBASH DHALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar MohapatraView PDF

    Summary The High Court of Orissa directed the trial court to expeditiously dispose of the plaintiff's injunction application (Order 39 Rule 1 & 2) within eight weeks, finding that repeated adjournments prejudiced the plaintiff in a joint family property partition suit where a co-sharer was continuing construction. The court imposed interim status quo on the disputed property for eight weeks to prevent irreversible changes before the merits are decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission 1

    Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/593/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Orissa directed the trial court to expeditiously dispose of the plaintiff's injunction application (Order 39 Rule 1 & 2) within eight weeks, finding that repeated adjournments prejudiced the plaintiff in a joint family property partition suit where a co-sharer was continuing construction. The court imposed interim status quo on the disputed property for eight weeks to prevent irreversible changes before the merits are decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case